<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fanny pack security.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/theft-thwarter-tips/purseology-101/fanny-pack-security-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters</link>
	<description>Pickpockets, Con Artists, Gangsters, Thieves, and Travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bambi</title>
		<link>http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/theft-thwarter-tips/purseology-101/fanny-pack-security-2/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Bambi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/wp-content/uploads/fannypack2.jpg#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Good idea, Roger. The point of my suggestion is to make it a fraction more difficult to open those waist pouches (or any bag, for that matter). The thieves who open zippers under a shield of some sort (newspaper, cardboard, a baby, a map) don&#039;t use knives, blades, or scissors. Those who use knives and scissors don&#039;t bother with a shield. Maybe it&#039;s &quot;one prop per thief?&quot; Anyway, anything that slows down the opening of a zipper, that is unexpected, that can&#039;t be easily undone blindly by someone other than you, is an extra layer of security and little bother to the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, Roger. The point of my suggestion is to make it a fraction more difficult to open those waist pouches (or any bag, for that matter). The thieves who open zippers under a shield of some sort (newspaper, cardboard, a baby, a map) don&#8217;t use knives, blades, or scissors. Those who use knives and scissors don&#8217;t bother with a shield. Maybe it&#8217;s &#8220;one prop per thief?&#8221; Anyway, anything that slows down the opening of a zipper, that is unexpected, that can&#8217;t be easily undone blindly by someone other than you, is an extra layer of security and little bother to the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/theft-thwarter-tips/purseology-101/fanny-pack-security-2/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobarno.com/thiefhunters/wp-content/uploads/fannypack2.jpg#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Looks like a much better idea than not having any catch at all. However, having just looked over some of your posts about slashing bags, I worry that it is too easy to cut the rubber band and then proceed as per usual.

Perhaps a cable-tie would be better? They are very tough to cut, I doubt it would be practical to cut them surreptitiously. Unlike the rubber band, the cable-tie doesn&#039;t have any give to assist you undoing the paperclip, but it can still be done by sucking in your gut and pulling in the belt half an inch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a much better idea than not having any catch at all. However, having just looked over some of your posts about slashing bags, I worry that it is too easy to cut the rubber band and then proceed as per usual.</p>
<p>Perhaps a cable-tie would be better? They are very tough to cut, I doubt it would be practical to cut them surreptitiously. Unlike the rubber band, the cable-tie doesn&#8217;t have any give to assist you undoing the paperclip, but it can still be done by sucking in your gut and pulling in the belt half an inch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

